<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: WordPress Tag Cloud Limit Fix</title> <atom:link href="http://hotblogtips.com/wordpress-tag-cloud-limit-fix/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://hotblogtips.com/wordpress-tag-cloud-limit-fix</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:55:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Brian Hawkins</title><link>http://hotblogtips.com/wordpress-tag-cloud-limit-fix#comment-429</link> <dc:creator>Brian Hawkins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:47:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hotblogtips.com/?p=98#comment-429</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know Sheryl, but it&#039;s a great question. I never considered Google viewing  tags as spam words. Key words, sure, but too many as spam words? It&#039;s definitely something to think about.At first guess I would think as long as they were relevant and not used multiple times tags should be safe. It&#039;s hard to read G&#039;s point of view on things like that so I&#039;m just guessing.Perhaps it&#039;s like the old meta tag key words. If a site had too many they would only count them up to a limit and ignore the rest as long as they were relevant. Now they don&#039;t consider any of them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know Sheryl, but it&#8217;s a great question. I never considered Google viewing  tags as spam words. Key words, sure, but too many as spam words? It&#8217;s definitely something to think about.</p><p>At first guess I would think as long as they were relevant and not used multiple times tags should be safe. It&#8217;s hard to read G&#8217;s point of view on things like that so I&#8217;m just guessing.</p><p>Perhaps it&#8217;s like the old meta tag key words. If a site had too many they would only count them up to a limit and ignore the rest as long as they were relevant. Now they don&#8217;t consider any of them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sheryl Loch</title><link>http://hotblogtips.com/wordpress-tag-cloud-limit-fix#comment-428</link> <dc:creator>Sheryl Loch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:38:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hotblogtips.com/?p=98#comment-428</guid> <description>Wow Brian what a way to start online today! LOL!
Jim is sooo special!I do have a question while I&#039;m here.I have heard that Google is looking more at tags than categories. Do you think that you can have 2 may words in your tag cloud &amp; then G will think of it as a list of spam words?I honestly don&#039;t know at this point, just askin.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Brian what a way to start online today! LOL!<br
/> Jim is sooo special!</p><p>I do have a question while I&#8217;m here.</p><p>I have heard that Google is looking more at tags than categories. Do you think that you can have 2 may words in your tag cloud &amp; then G will think of it as a list of spam words?</p><p>I honestly don&#8217;t know at this point, just askin.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian Hawkins</title><link>http://hotblogtips.com/wordpress-tag-cloud-limit-fix#comment-427</link> <dc:creator>Brian Hawkins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:56:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hotblogtips.com/?p=98#comment-427</guid> <description>Hey Jim, congratulations, you have been featured on &lt;a href=&quot;http://lowlifespammer.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LowLifeSpammer.com&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jim, congratulations, you have been featured on <a
href="http://lowlifespammer.com/" target="_blank">LowLifeSpammer.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim</title><link>http://hotblogtips.com/wordpress-tag-cloud-limit-fix#comment-419</link> <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:59:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hotblogtips.com/?p=98#comment-419</guid> <description>Wow this is some real good content. I just bookmarked, stumbled and tweeted this post. Keep up the good work and i&#039;ll be sure to return! Enjoy you&#039;re day!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow this is some real good content. I just bookmarked, stumbled and tweeted this post. Keep up the good work and i&#8217;ll be sure to return! Enjoy you&#8217;re day!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sheryl Loch</title><link>http://hotblogtips.com/wordpress-tag-cloud-limit-fix#comment-403</link> <dc:creator>Sheryl Loch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 10:47:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hotblogtips.com/?p=98#comment-403</guid> <description>Geesh, You want the Tag Cloud Limit fixed and the Twitter ID to both work?Gettin a bit greedy?Actually I just posted so you could see if the Twitter thingy was working. LOL!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geesh, You want the Tag Cloud Limit fixed and the Twitter ID to both work?</p><p>Gettin a bit greedy?</p><p>Actually I just posted so you could see if the Twitter thingy was working. LOL!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://hotblogtips.com/wordpress-tag-cloud-limit-fix#comment-402</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 17:07:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hotblogtips.com/?p=98#comment-402</guid> <description>Testing the Twitter ID comment function. Please please pleeease work!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testing the Twitter ID comment function. Please please pleeease work!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/13 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via N/A

Served from: hotblogtips.com @ 2010-07-30 05:55:53 -->